A student asked me if contains itself. This can be interpreted to mean that for some positive integer , where is the sequence , which is false as it would imply that is rational. It can also be interpreted to mean that the sequence has a proper sub-sequence that is equal to it. This will be my interpretation in this post.
Lemma. Every sequence with has a proper sub-sequence that is equal to it.
Proof. Let , let , and let for every integer with , where . Since , it is the case that an can always be found such that and for every integer with . Then .
Alternative Proof. Let be such that and . Let be such that and . Let be such that and . Repeat this process indefinitely. If this is not possible, then there is an such that for every with , i.e., does not repeat indefinitely. In this case, let for every and repeat this process starting at . Since at least one element in the range of repeats indefinitely, it is possible to repeat this process indefinitely. It follows that .
Claim. has a proper sub-sequence that is equal to it.
Proof. Since is an infinite sequence with finite range, it follows from the above lemma that has a proper sub-sequence that is equal to it.
Although this result is not profound, it led me to ask myself: is the fiber of every under infinite? This may be an open problem.
Happy Day!